The argument
Healthcare workers experience mental health conditions at rates similar to or higher than the general population, yet they seek care far less often. The gap holds across the professions: nurses, physicians, technicians, support staff, pharmacists, therapists, and trainees. The obstacles are largely structural and cultural rather than a matter of access. Intrusive questions on licensing and credentialing applications, fears about confidentiality and career consequences, and persistent stigma all raise the cost of asking for help. These barriers are modifiable.
Risk is also not concentrated where the attention has been. In a national cohort followed through 2019, healthcare support workers, registered nurses, and health technicians each carried significantly elevated suicide risk relative to workers outside healthcare, while physicians did not (Olfson et al., JAMA 2023). Physician mental health has drawn the most study and the most reform. Several of the groups at highest measured risk have drawn the least.
The structural barriers have the same shape across licensing boards. An audit of registered nurse and advanced practice registered nurse licensure applications found only 13 states fully adherent to the recommended standard (Melnyk et al., 2023), and an earlier review found that 22 of the 30 nursing boards asking about mental illness posed questions inconsistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (Halter et al., 2019). The physician version of this problem is simply the best documented, which is why the paper below uses it as the worked example.
This talk reviews the evidence and offers concrete recommendations for licensing boards, hospitals, training programs, and colleagues who want to make it safer for any healthcare worker to get help. The resources below are meant to be used and shared.
The three papers behind the numbers above.
-
Suicide Risks of Health Care Workers in the US
Olfson M, Cosgrove CM, Wall MM, Blanco C. JAMA. 2023;330(12):1161-1166. National cohort study. Elevated suicide risk for healthcare support workers, registered nurses, and health technicians; no elevated risk for physicians over the study period.
-
An audit of mental health questions on U.S. nursing licensure applications
Melnyk BM, Holod AF, Hsieh AP, Feist JC. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2023;20(5):422-430. Only 13 states fully adhered to the recommended checklist for RN and APRN applications.
-
State Nursing Licensure Questions About Mental Illness and Compliance With the ADA
Halter MJ, Rolin DG, Adamaszek M, Ladenheim MC, Hutchens BF. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 2019;57(8):17-22. Of the 30 boards asking about mental illness, 22 asked questions inconsistent with the ADA.
The paper
Saddawi-Konefka D, Moutier CY, Ehrenfeld JM. Reducing Barriers to Mental Health Care for Physicians: An Overview and Strategic Recommendations. JAMA. Published online August 14, 2025. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.12587
Read the paper in JAMAThis summary paper lays out the barriers, why they persist, and what actually lowers them. It works the problem through in physicians because that is where the evidence base and the reform history run deepest, but the argument and the recommendations apply to the healthcare workforce as a whole.
Resources
These serve the whole healthcare workforce unless noted otherwise.
- 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline
- The Emotional PPE Project: free, confidential therapy
- AFSP: suicide prevention for healthcare professionals
- Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes' Foundation: advocacy and toolkits
- Wellbeing First Champion Challenge: licensure and credentialing audit
- Impact Wellbeing (CDC / NIOSH): tools for hospital leaders
- Make the Difference (APSF): trainee suicide prevention video
-
988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline
Free and confidential, 24/7, for anyone in crisis or worried about someone else. Call or text 988.
-
The Emotional PPE Project
A nonprofit connecting healthcare workers to free, confidential mental health support from volunteer licensed therapists. Open to anyone who works in healthcare, clinical or not. No cost, no insurance, no red tape.
-
AFSP: Suicide Prevention for Healthcare Professionals
Resources from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention tailored to clinicians and healthcare organizations.
-
Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes' Foundation
Advocacy and practical toolkits for reducing burnout and removing intrusive mental health questions from licensing and credentialing applications.
-
Improving Licensure & Credentialing Applications (Wellbeing First Champion Challenge)
The audit toolkit and step-by-step process a board or hospital uses to review and fix its own application language. Verified boards now span medicine, nursing, pharmacy, dentistry, psychology, and counseling, along with hospitals and staffing organizations.
-
Impact Wellbeing (CDC / NIOSH)
A federal campaign giving hospital leaders evidence-informed steps to improve working conditions and mental health for their entire workforce, plus guidance for workers who want to push their institution to adopt it.
-
Make the Difference: Preventing Medical Trainee Suicide (APSF)
Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation training video on recognizing risk and intervening. Written for physician trainees, though the recognize-and-respond skills generalize.
Responding to impairment questions on forms
Licensing and credentialing applications across the health professions still ask about hypothetical impairment, whether a condition "might" or "could" affect practice. The question appears on medical, nursing, pharmacy, and dental board applications and in hospital credentialing packets, and it sits at odds with the spirit of the Americans with Disabilities Act; the Joint Commission has discouraged it.
A response that can be entered directly in the form's text box:
"Regarding questions about health conditions, [Name] has no issues with impairment. I checked 'Yes' as I do for all individuals when facing hypothetical questions like this. Asking about hypothetical impairment ('might affect') is at odds with the ADA and has been discouraged by the Joint Commission. Please revise this question."
A better question, on the model Virginia adopted (HB 1573):
"(i) Do you have any reason to believe that you would pose a risk to the safety or well-being of your patients or clients? (ii) Are you able to perform the essential functions of a practitioner in your area of practice, with or without reasonable accommodation?"
For anyone in a position to change the form rather than answer it, the Wellbeing First Champion Challenge provides the audit checklist and the verification process, for any licensing board or credentialing body.
References
Every source cited in the talk, with links to the DOI or publisher where one exists.